Rebuttal from Michel Bouvier and Terence E. Hébert

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Editorial and Rebuttal from Authors

As more and more men undergo radical prostatectomy as their primary treatment for prostate cancer, it is becoming evident that not all of them will enjoy a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free status for the rest of their life. As presented in other series with long-term follow-up, the risk for biochemical recurrence continued to increase over time in a large European series from Hamburg [1]. T...

متن کامل

108 Terence Horgan And

In debate over the truth or falsity of folk psychology (henceforth, FP, a notation which also will go proxy for 'folk psychological'), the most influential players tend to line up on the U.S. coasts: friends of FP, like Jerry Fodor and William Lycan, on the East; foes, like Paul Churchland, Patricia Churchland, and Stephen Stich until recently, on the W e s t . 1 There are important voices in o...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from Millet, Faiss, and Pialoux.

Read more and get great! That's what the book enPDFd rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux will give for every reader to read this book. This is an on-line book provided in this website. Even this book becomes a choice of someone to read, many in the world also loves it so much. As what we talk, when you read more every page of this rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux, what you will obtain ...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from Daniel Beard and Eric Feigl.

Dr. Andrew’s proposal (Andrew, 2013) to rename Guyton’s venous return curve the ‘venous pressure curve’ seems unlikely to overcome the decades of misinterpretation and confusion that the Guytonmodel of the systemic circulation has engendered. In Guyton’s experiments venous return curves were produced with a pump connected from the right atrium to the pulmonary artery in an anaesthetized, open c...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen

We have read the point of view presented elegantly by Tzeng and Panerai (2018) with interest. We have to admit there is little hard evidence on which we can base our preference for enhanced blood pressure variability. The arguments against, however, are also not very strong. The argument is perhaps more strongly based on basic principles than solid evidence. We fully agree with Tzeng and Panera...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Physiology

سال: 2014

ISSN: 0022-3751

DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.274233